Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQN9YWHWaNCc2Wf1g0RuMuFtROKPx2DDYgCZ0jCAprReA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hence, to be consistent with others, bgworker processes can be
> initialized from BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionBy[Oid].

Yeah, I am fine with that. Thanks for the updated versions.
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kuntal Ghosh
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)
Next
From: Alexey Kondratov
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] GSOC'17 project introduction: Parallel COPY execution with errorshandling