Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQHgjLD1y5GzBqTFs4C_+z6N67e+eTA78YyPm5sMjoaUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-05-27 19:48:24 +0300, Vladimir Borodin wrote:
>> Well, actually clean shutdown of master with exit code 0 from `pg_ctl
>> stop -m fast` guarantees that all WAL has been replicated to standby.
>
> It does not.  It makes it likely, but the connection to the standby
> could be not up just then, you could run into walsender timeout, and a
> bunch of other scenarios.

Amen.

>> And if something would go wrong in above logic, postgres will not let you attach old master as a standby of new
master.So it is highly probable not a setup problem.
 
>
> There's no such guarantee.  There's a bunch of checks that'll somewhat
> likely trigger, but nothing more than that.

Yes. Take for example the case where the host with a primary is
plugged off, and another host with a standby is promoted. If at next
restart you add directly for the old primary a recovery.conf and
attempt to use it as a standby to the new primary it may be able to
connect and to begin replication. That will result in a corrupted
standby.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] simplehash.h typo