Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ8KpphNL6jS8whjLMODgsoCa1t6CD7mCsSG43O_WrgPg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]  (Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com>)
Responses Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com> wrote:
>>If a feature changes the shape of WAL records, XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC is bumped to prevent any problems.
>
> I've attached patch with a bump, but, obviously, it'll be irrelevant
> after any other commit changing WAL shape.

Usually the committer in charge of reviewing such a patch would bump
it. There is no need for the patch submitter to do so. I should have
been more precise previously, sorry for my twisted words.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values