Re: update with no changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marcos Pegoraro
Subject Re: update with no changes
Date
Msg-id CAB-JLwboisbEZDMgunY3o=oYcckQ_MU0SSWByWrSVgL8jXZ7fA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: update with no changes  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: update with no changes
Re: update with no changes
List pgsql-hackers
I get the idea of letting the server centralize logic like this - but frankly if the application is choosing to send all that data across the wire just to have the server throw it away the application is wasting network I/O.  If it does manage its resources carefully then the server will never even see an update and its behavior here becomes moot.

I understand your point, it´s responsability of application to do what it has to do. But lots of times (maybe 98% of them) is not same people doing server side and application side. So, Postgres guys will have to review all code being done on apps ?

And ok, thanks for explaining me. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sequence cache is kept forever
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: sequence cache is kept forever