Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Better visualization of default values - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marcos Pegoraro
Subject Re: Better visualization of default values
Date
Msg-id CAB-JLwa1BwESd_OJZftOeaw4dSCg29rd1nhc3gLwYZ1N8yxwrw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better visualization of default values  (Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Em qui., 6 de fev. de 2025 às 12:32, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> escreveu:
That seems a somewhat arbitrary goal for us to optimize for. 

well, my goal was to standardize these values. As examples of non standardization you have ...

"The default is typically 100 connections". 
Tipically ? Is it 100 or not the default for it ?

"The default value is three connections" or "The default is one thousand files"
Why three and not 3 or why thousand and not 1000 ?

Sometimes "an empty string", sometimes "empty", sometimes ''.

Sometimes "If this parameter is off (the default)", "Default is off",  "Default value is off"

So, if we move all them to the definition of that GUC they would be written the same way, just that.

regards
Marcos

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.
Next
From: Alexander Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.