Re: logical replication restrictions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marcos Pegoraro
Subject Re: logical replication restrictions
Date
Msg-id CAB-JLwYHqgqGM5e+_xos6-D-YnVGH31YDBQE_gnd+DNBxS2zOA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical replication restrictions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
oh okay, I think this can be useful in some cases where we want to avoid data loss similar to its use for physical standby. For example, if the user has by mistake truncated the table (or deleted some required data) on the publisher, we can always it from the subscriber if we have such a feature.

Having said that, I am not sure if we can call it a restriction. It is more of a TODO kind of thing. It doesn't sound advisable to me to keep growing the current Restrictions page
 
OK, so, could you guide me where to start on this feature ?

regards, 
Marcos

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gareth Palmer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax
Next
From: Sergei Kornilov
Date:
Subject: Re: extensible options syntax for replication parser?