Re: Allow WindowFuncs prosupport function to use more optimal WindowClause options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Allow WindowFuncs prosupport function to use more optimal WindowClause options
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvrkd75-Bjcz8crze-KzsPEVzpZn6DepzOkq-VGx33X30g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allow WindowFuncs prosupport function to use more optimal WindowClause options  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Allow WindowFuncs prosupport function to use more optimal WindowClause options  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 13:34, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> So it looks like the same can be done for rank() and dense_rank() too.
> I've added support for those in the attached.

The attached adds support for percent_rank(), cume_dist() and ntile().

David

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: has_privs_of_role vs. is_member_of_role, redux
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: has_privs_of_role vs. is_member_of_role, redux