Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvr_BxaanDH4tUmW9yGsw33dhkwqDn8VO_pkMjnYg9uTUA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 06:38, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2021-03-29 11:48:47 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > I've done that in the attached.  I added the
> > ParallelBlockTableScanWorkerData as a pointer field in
> > HeapScanDescData and change it so we only allocate memory for it for
> > just parallel scans.  The field is left as NULL for non-parallel
> > scans.
>
> LGTM.

Thanks for having a look.

Pushed.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: psql lacking clearerr()
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: psql lacking clearerr()