On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 03:52, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> Just sending a reply to -hackers so I can add it to the commitfest.
I had a look at the patch in [1] and I find it a bit weird that we'd
write the following about autovacuum_work_mem in our docs:
+ <para>
+ Note that <command>VACUUM</command> has a hard-coded limit of 1GB
+ for the amount of memory used, so setting
+ <varname>autovacuum_work_mem</varname> higher than that has no effect.
+ </para>
Since that setting is *only* used for auto vacuum, why don't we just
limit the range of the GUC to 1GB?
Of course, it wouldn't be wise to backpatch the reduced limit of
autovacuum_work_mem as it might upset people who have higher values in
their postgresql.conf when their database fails to restart after an
upgrade. I think what might be best is just to reduce the limit in
master and apply the doc patch for just maintenance_work_mem in all
supported versions. We could just ignore doing anything with
autovacuum_work_mem in the back branches and put it down to a
historical mistake that can't easily be fixed now.
I've attached what I came up with.
What do you think?
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/514fe5ce4714b7b33cb0a611f0c7b72df413bef5.camel%40cybertec.at
