Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David Rowley
Subject Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvr=w2Vv_Z8uk-Zoihz74qs=t7+w3k71eKOufS96pJy6ww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty  (Walker Philips <wphilips53@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 12:14, Walker Philips <wphilips53@gmail.com> wrote:
> The following function's metadata is not correctly reported in the pg_proc table (see picture below).

Seems quite unlikely this such a fundamental thing could be broken.

Can you share which version of PostgreSQL you see this on?

I see the proargtypes populated properly on current master.

David



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Walker Philips
Date:
Subject: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty