Re: Tid scan improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Tid scan improvements
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvqqqHk_rZgtHUv_AJgrt5WFLZk=1gO--8gmRAQbrNWDGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tid scan improvements  (Edmund Horner <ejrh00@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Tid scan improvements  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 23:46, Edmund Horner <ejrh00@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:11, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch didn't add _outTidRangePath() even though we have outNode()
>> coverage for most/all path nodes.  Was this just forgotten?  See
>> attached patch.
>
>
> Yes, it looks like an omission.  Thanks for spotting it.  Patch looks good to me.

Yeah. That was forgotten.  Patch also looks fine to me.  Do you want
to push it, Peter?

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Edmund Horner
Date:
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/pg_visibility fails regression under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS