Re: Tid scan improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Tid scan improvements
Date
Msg-id f4accbba-15db-4a21-175b-947317d13acd@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tid scan improvements  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 07.06.21 13:50, David Rowley wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 23:46, Edmund Horner <ejrh00@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:11, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch didn't add _outTidRangePath() even though we have outNode()
>>> coverage for most/all path nodes.  Was this just forgotten?  See
>>> attached patch.
>>
>>
>> Yes, it looks like an omission.  Thanks for spotting it.  Patch looks good to me.
> 
> Yeah. That was forgotten.  Patch also looks fine to me.  Do you want
> to push it, Peter?

done



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body