Re: Tid scan improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Edmund Horner
Subject Re: Tid scan improvements
Date
Msg-id CAMyN-kAH1e3Wd6GYsV=N6z8_P1TSUHn4D6FTJnw-GEy91i9UYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tid scan improvements  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Tid scan improvements  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:11, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
This patch didn't add _outTidRangePath() even though we have outNode()
coverage for most/all path nodes.  Was this just forgotten?  See
attached patch.

Yes, it looks like an omission.  Thanks for spotting it.  Patch looks good to me.

Edmund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements