On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 01:11, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm happy to proceed with the v7 version. I'm also happy to credit you
> as the primary author of it, given that you came up with the v2b
> patch. It might be best to extract the performance stuff that's in v7
> and apply that separately from the bug fix. If you're still interested
> and have time in the next 7 hours to do it, would you be able to split
> the v7 as described, making v8-0001 as the bug fix and v8-0002 as the
> performance stuff? If so, could you also add the total_jumble_len to
> v8-0001 like Michael's last patch had, but adjust so it's only
> maintained for Assert builds. Michael is quite keen on having more
> assurance that custom jumble functions don't decide to forego any
> jumbling.
>
> If you don't have time, I'll do it in my morning (UTC+13).
Here is the v8 version with the bug fix and performance stuff
separated out. I also added the Assert code to ensure we always add
something to the jumble buffer when jumbling a node.
I didn't include the regression tests I saw in the v2b patch [1]. I
felt these were just marking the fact that there used to be a bug
here.
David
[1] https://postgr.es/m/5ac172e0b77a4baba50671cd1a15285f%40localhost.localdomain
