On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 02:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Indeed. I think this is entirely pointless; there's zero hope that
> any consistency you might establish right now will persist very long.
> The largest effect of this proposed patch will be to create
> back-patching headaches.
hmm. Yet we do have other standards which we do manage to maintain.
I did limit the scope to just the docs and error messages. My thoughts
were that someone fudging a backpatch on the docs seems less likely to
cause a nuclear meltdown than someone doing the same in .c code.
David
