On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 00:06, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think if you're going to reject this patch, a brief comment should
> be added to that code to justify why that existing superfluous check
> is worthwhile.
It seems strange to add a comment to explain why it's there. If we're
going to the trouble of doing that, then we should just remove it and
add a very small comment to mention why INT8 sequences don't need to
be checked.
Patch attached
David
