Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvp4KLg7xmg_nXLD6EPkOFrGNQDGfLQQBFVUBveSQXENyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 13:31, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> It feels like if we're going to fix this negative rounding thing then
> we should maybe do it and backpatch a fix then rebase this work on top
> of that.

Here's a patch which I believe makes pg_size_pretty() and
pg_size_pretty_numeric() match in regards to negative values.

Maybe this plus your regression test would be ok to back-patch?

David
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: bugfix: when the blocksize is 32k, the function page_header of pageinspect returns negative numbers.
Next
From: Tatsuro Yamada
Date:
Subject: Re: list of extended statistics on psql (\dX)