On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 at 20:34, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> In one query I can see very big overhead of memoize node - unfortunately with hits = 0
>
> The Estimate is almost very good. See details in attachment
Are you able to share the version number for this?
Also, it would be good to see EXPLAIN ANALYZE *VERBOSE* for the
memorize plan so we can see the timings for the parallel workers.
The results of:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT DISTINCT ictc.sub_category_id
FROM ixfk_ictc_subcategoryid ictc
INNER JOIN item i ON i.item_category_id = ictc.sub_category_id
WHERE ictc.super_category_id = ANY
('{47124,49426,49488,47040,47128}'::bigint[]);
would also be useful. That should give an idea of the ndistinct
estimate. I guess memorize thinks there are fewer unique values than
the 112 that were found. There's probably not much to be done about
that. The slowness of the parallel workers seems like a more
interesting thing to understand.
David
