Re: Removed extra memory allocations from create_list_bounds - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Removed extra memory allocations from create_list_bounds
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvojW2g_oXGTjGUtf9kBFGuxr8rxB+WvzGhZK0C-vLJkhQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Removed extra memory allocations from create_list_bounds  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 05:03, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> Also, if you're going to remove the initializations here, maybe you'd also
> change i and j to C99 "for" declarations like "for (int i=0, j=0; ...)"
>
> -       PartitionListValue **all_values = NULL;
> -       ListCell   *cell;
> -       int                     i = 0;
> -       int                     ndatums = 0;
> +       PartitionListValue *all_values;
> +       int                     i;
> +       int                     j;
> +       int                     ndatums;
>
> Same in get_non_null_list_datum_count()

I tend to only get motivated to use that for new code that does not
exist in back-branches.  I'll maybe stop doing that when we no longer
have to support the pre-C99 versions of the code.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Removed extra memory allocations from create_list_bounds
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor typo in generate_useful_gather_paths comment