Re: bad JIT decision - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Rowley
Subject Re: bad JIT decision
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvo+Wxzs8Pb_iPvT64j8vCFsnqQk8qwqvm2h-CLHSS1ahw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad JIT decision  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 at 02:54, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > ... nested at the bottom level join, about 6 joins deep.  The lack of
> > any row being found results in upper level joins not having to do
> > anything, and the majority of the plan is (never executed).
>
> On re-reading this, that last point struck me forcibly.  If most of
> the plan never gets executed, could we avoid compiling it?  That is,
> maybe JIT isn't JIT enough, and we should make compilation happen
> at first use of an expression not during executor startup.

That's interesting.  But it would introduce an additional per
evaluation cost of checking if we're doing the first execution.

David



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: bad JIT decision
Next
From: Surya Widyanto
Date:
Subject: Re: [SOLUTION] Slow or Cannot Connect to PostgreSQL Instance Service on Windows 10