Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I think the point is that if the committee updates with a further > version of the file, how do you find the new version? We need a URL > that's one step removed from the final file, so that we can see if we > need to update it. Maybe we can provide both URLs for convenience.
+1. Could be phrased along the lines of "documents are at URL1, currently synced with URL2" so that it's clear that URL2 should be updated when we re-sync with a newer release.
Yes, this is what I was thinking. I was integrating this into my installer, used the "new" URL provided to download the file, and spent several minutes wondering why the script was failing (and what I had broken in it), before realising what had happened.
