On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:11 PM Jelte Fennema <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
>
> I think using `now()` is quite prone to sequence rollover. With the
> current patch inserting more than 2^18~=0.26M rows into a table with
> `gen_uuid_v7()` as the default in a single transaction would already
> cause sequence rollover.
Well, the current patch will just use now()+1ms when 2^18 is
exhausted. Even if now() would be passed as an argument (however
current patch does not support an argument).
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
