Re: a litter question about mdunlinkfiletag function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From px shi
Subject Re: a litter question about mdunlinkfiletag function
Date
Msg-id CAAccyYKFru-w8L08ORK=S2Yg7+44Kpu3Avi0boRv9BorvSoWLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: a litter question about mdunlinkfiletag function  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
You will find other places where relpathperm() is called without having
a FileTag structure available, e.g. ReorderBufferProcessTXN().

I apologize for the confusion. What I meant to say is that in the mdunlinkfiletag() function, the forknum is currently hardcoded as MAIN_FORKNUM when calling relpathperm(). While mdunlinkfiletag currently only handles MAIN_FORKNUM, wouldn’t it be more flexible to retrieve the forknum from the ftag structure instead?


Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> 于2024年10月15日周二 04:59写道:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:43:17AM +0800, px shi wrote:
> Hi, hackers
>
> When calculating the path, forknum is hardcoded as MAIN_FORKNUM:
>
> /* Compute the path. */
> p = relpathperm(ftag->rnode, MAIN_FORKNUM);
>
>
> But since the ftag structure already contains forknum:
>
> typedef struct FileTag
> {
> int16 handler; /* SyncRequestHandler value, saving space */
> int16 forknum; /* ForkNumber, saving space */
> RelFileNode rnode;
> uint32 segno;
> } FileTag;
>
>
> Wouldn’t it be more flexible to use the value from the ftag structure directly?

You will find other places where relpathperm() is called without having
a FileTag structure available, e.g. ReorderBufferProcessTXN().

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
  "Am I going to die soon?"

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing the default random_page_cost value
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing the default random_page_cost value