Re: Parallel safety docs for CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Coleman
Subject Re: Parallel safety docs for CTEs
Date
Msg-id CAAaqYe_vKTjY-ZjNGMJmSAGJWeBeS+afRi2fAWa5rpBx1QAXhQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Parallel safety docs for CTEs
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 2:16 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> A colleague noticed today that the docs still say that "Scans of
> common table expressions (CTEs)" are "always parallel restricted".
>
> While I think that strictly remains true at the implementation level,
> from a user's perspective I think that's not been true since the
> change to default to trying to inline CTEs rather than defaulting to
> materializing them.
>
> Attached is a patch to slightly modify the language; would be happy to
> hear suggestions on a better way to improve this.
>
> Regards,
> James Coleman

I'd forgotten to make a commit fest record for this and stumbled upon
it today. See https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5650/

Regards,
James Coleman



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: AIO v2.5
Next
From: "Devulapalli, Raghuveer"
Date:
Subject: RE: CRC32C Parallel Computation Optimization on ARM