On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It's a bit disturbing that nobody has reported this from the field yet.
> Seems to imply that hot standby isn't being used much.
I have seen this, but didn't get to dig in, as I thought it could be a
problem from other things done outside Postgres (it also came up in
#6200, but I didn't mention it).
Consider it retroactively reported.
--
fdr
