Re: HTTP Frontend? (and a brief thought on materialized views) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Farina
Subject Re: HTTP Frontend? (and a brief thought on materialized views)
Date
Msg-id CAAZKuFapGZC49bsM8qFZtSQSAga6t8D38x1tSG_83feZ3+00Sw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HTTP Frontend? (and a brief thought on materialized views)  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: HTTP Frontend? (and a brief thought on materialized views)  (Dobes Vandermeer <dobesv@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote:
> Any enhancement here that can't be used with libpq via, say, drop-in
> .so seems unworkable to me, and that's why any solution that is
> basically proxying to the database is basically a non-starter outside
> the very earliest prototyping stages.  The tuple scanning and protocol
> semantics can and even should remain the same, especially at first.

I should add: proxying could work well if libpq had all the right
hooks. The server could remain ignorant.  Regardless, upstream changes
result.

--
fdr


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: tracking context switches with perf record
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tracking context switches with perf record