Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests
Date
Msg-id CAAWbhmjRHYG_HN-yuej5Q7tUYuViodXm7BusjUkUyv2fW-+KPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 6:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I was refreshing my mind with 0001 yesterday, and except for the two
> parts where we need to worry about AUTH_REQ_OK being sent too early
> and the business with gssenc, this is a rather straight-forward.  It
> also looks like the the participants of the thread are OK with the
> design you are proposing (list of keywords, potentially negative
> patterns).  I think that I can get this part merged for this CF, at
> least, not sure about the rest :p

Thanks! Is there anything that would make the sslcertmode patch more
palatable? Or any particular areas of concern?

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM