On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 9:04 PM Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su> wrote:
> В письме от четверг, 30 июня 2022 г. 06:47:48 MSK пользователь Nikolay Shaplov
> написал:
>
> > Hi! I am surely feel this patch is important. I have bigger patch
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3536/ and this test makes sense as a
> > part of big work of options refactoring,
> >
> > I am also was strongly advised to commit things chopped into smaller parts,
> > when possible. This test can be commit separately so I am doing it.
>
> Let me again explain why this test is importaint, so potential reviewers can
> easily find this information.
>
> Tests are for developers. You change the code and see that something does not
> work anymore, as it worked before.
> When you change the code, you should keep both documented and undocumented
> behaviour. Because user's code can intentionally or accidentally use it.
[developer hat] Right, but I think Greg also pointed out the tradeoff
here, and my understanding was that he didn't feel that the tradeoff
was enough. If this is related to a bigger refactoring, it may be
easier to argue the test's value if it's discussed there? (This could
be frustrating if you've just been told to split things up, sorry.)
[CFM hat] Since you feel strongly about the patch, and we're short on
time before the commitfest starts, I have re-registered this. That way
there can be an explicit decision as opposed to a pocket veto by me.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3747/
Thanks,
--Jacob
