On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Agreed. No need in adding overhead for short-lived locks because the
> milli-second values are going to be meaningless to users. I would be
> happy if we could find some weasel value for non-heavyweight locks.
To avoid a NULL value for waiting_start, and thanks to non-heavyweight
locks don't exceed order-of-milliseconds, I think it would be
acceptable to just return now() whenever something wants to know
waiting_start i.e. when something selects from pg_stat_activity.
The exact value would only be within orders-of-milliseconds away from
now() anyway, so one can argue it's not that important, as long as the
documentation is clear on that point.
