Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Jacobson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CAASwCXdyOhP7etCirNGG70ZgvfHPJpcvYyOv5tDnhdDL5V+bnw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL  (Jan de Visser <jan@de-visser.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Immutable functions can and do use functionality from all over the
> server. They just don't depend on user-visible mutable _state_
> elsewhere in the server.

OK, fair point, but at least the functionality *could* be written without using
existing C functions, since its only the input that determine what
output will be returned. The dependencies used by the immutable
functions can also be ported, function by function, until there are
no dependencies.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Next
From: Keith Fiske
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take