Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:28 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:18 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The patch does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a rebased patch:
> > === Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID
> > 4f74f5641d53559ec44e74d5bf552e167fdd5d20 ===
> > === applying patch
> > ./v49-0003-Add-system-view-tracking-IO-ops-per-backend-type.patch
> > ....
> > patching file src/test/regress/expected/rules.out
> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 1876.
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > src/test/regress/expected/rules.out.rej
> >
> > [1] - http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_41_3272.log
>
> Yes, it conflicted with 47bb9db75996232. rebased v50 is attached.

Oh dear-- an extra FlushBuffer() snuck in there somehow.
Removed it in attached v51.
Also, I fixed an issue in my tablespace.sql updates

- Melanie