Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_Zjs-Egy_pwEDV7t-1aD9K2zyOzb1Gwbsa-jN+k0kTEZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:24 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:03 PM Melanie Plageman
> <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it isn't important, but I find this wording confusing. You
> > mention lazy_scan_prune() and then mention that "the whole test is in
> > one place instead of spread out" -- which kind of makes it sound like
> > you are consolidating FSM updates for both the lazy_scan_noprune() and
> > lazy_scan_prune() cases. Perhaps simply flipping the order of the "since
> > the caller" and "moreover, this way" conjunctions would solve it. I
> > defer to your judgment.
>
> I rewrote the commit message a bit. See what you think of this version.

All LGTM.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: index prefetching
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "ERROR: could not open relation with OID 16391" error was encountered when reindexing