Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_ZSz=MkPvsdnSxeUwGtkNV8c8iS91rrO_-KPdKTyG_9=w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum
Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 3:23 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've committed the btree and gist read stream users. I think we can
> come back to the test after feature freeze and make sure it is super
> solid.

I've now committed the spgist vacuum user as well. I'll mark the CF
entry as completed.
I wonder if we should do GIN?

> Looking at the spgist read stream user, I see you didn't convert
> spgprocesspending(). It seems like you could write a callback that
> uses the posting list and streamify this as well.

It's probably not worth it -- since we process the pending list for
each page of the index.

- Melanie



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: acronym, glossary and other related matters in the docs
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions