Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_YdzP42WTZPQO0QePosxFqjHavC1v87BMaaiXqD9b12wA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
List pgsql-hackers
Attached is v14 which adds back in tests for the BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT
option. I haven't included a test for VACUUM (BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT x,
PARALLEL x) for the reason I mentioned upthread -- even if we force it
to actually do the parallel vacuuming, we are adding exercising the code
where parallel vacuum workers make their own buffer access strategy
rings but not really adding a test that will fail usefully. If something
is wrong with the configurability of the buffer access strategy object,
I don't see how it will break differently in parallel vacuum workers vs
regular vacuum.

- Melanie

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: failure in 019_replslot_limit