On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:33:35PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:47:51PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> My feeling is that we should get the BNLJ committed first, and then maybe >> use some of those additional strategies as fallbacks (depending on which >> issues are still unsolved by the BNLJ). > >The glacier is melting more. Tomas, what's your status here? The >patch has been waiting on author for two months now. If you are not >planning to work more on this one, then it should be marked as >returned with feedback?
I'm not planning to do any any immediate work on this, so I agree with marking it as RWF. I think Melanie is working on the BNL patch, which seems like the right solution.
Sorry for the delay. I have posted the parallel-aware version BNLJ (adaptive HJ) of this in the thread which originally had all of the patches for it [1]. It's not near committable, so I wasn't going to register it for a commitfest yet, but I would love feedback on the prototype.
