On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:22 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:41:46PM +0530, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:05 PM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: > > Kindly have a look at the attached version. > > IMHO, 0001 looks fine, except probably the comment could be phrased a > bit more nicely.
And the new option should be documented at the top of the init() routine for perldoc.
Added in the attached version.
> That can be left for whoever commits this to > wordsmith. Michael, what are your plans?
Not much, so feel free to not wait for me. I've just read through the patch because I like the idea/feature :)
Thank you, that helped a lot.
> 0002 seems like a reasonable approach, but there's a hunk in the wrong > patch: 0004 modifies pg_combinebackup's check_control_files to use > get_dir_controlfile() rather than git_controlfile(), but it looks to > me like that should be part of 0002.
Fixed in the attached version.
I'm slightly concerned about 0002 that silently changes the meaning of get_controlfile(). That would impact extension code without people knowing about it when compiling, just when they run their stuff under 17~.
Agreed, now they will have an error as _could not read file "<DataDir>": Is a directory_. But, IIUC, that what usually happens with the dev version, and the extension needs to be updated for compatibility with the newer version for the same reason.
