Re: Multiple primary key on partition table? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From amul sul
Subject Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?
Date
Msg-id CAAJ_b97=NGFsmhiK0EwdbRR1+FOFBSKvU=GkHNi0M8nXj2TfkQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:25 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-Oct-01, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:20 AM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is the complete patch proposes the aforesaid fix with regression test.
> >
> > Thanks, This worked for me.
>
> Yeah, looks good to me, pushed.  I added one more regression test to
> ensure that the PRIMARY KEY clause in the partition is still accepted if
> the parent does not have one.
>

Thanks a lot, for enhancing regression and committing the fix.

Regards,
Amul


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Assertion failure with ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION withlog_min_messages >= DEBUG1
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive andanti-wraparound ru