Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amul Sul
Subject Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command
Date
Msg-id CAAJ_b95p69s7j=gZi6w6oqc7aZB0EXnoceUF4f7oaotdwa9beQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command  ("Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>)
Responses Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:56 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021, at 8:18 AM, Amul Sul wrote:
>
> The attached patch adds a small test for recovery_end_command execution.
>
> Additional coverage is always a good thing.
>

Thanks for the confirmation.

> Currently, patch tests execution of recovery_end_command by creating
> dummy file, I am not wedded only to this approach, other suggestions
> also welcome.
>
> This test file is for archiving only. It seems 020_archive_status.pl is more
> appropriate for testing this parameter.
>

Ok, moved to 020_archive_status.pl in the attached version.

> Also, we don't have a good test for archive_cleanup_command as well, I
> am not sure how we could test that which executes with every
> restart-point.
>
> Setup a replica and stop it. It triggers a restartpoint during the shutdown.

Yeah, added that test too. I triggered the restartpoint via a
CHECKPOINT command in the attached version.

Note that I haven't tested the current version on Windows, will
cross-check that tomorrow.

Regards,
Amul

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file