On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 1:31 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:06:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:41 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm not sure about 0001 but I think 0002 deserves a back patch as I think it fits
> > > into the "low-risk fixes" category [0].
> >
> > I'm inclined to back-patch both, then. We might have more small fixes
> > and they'll be less risky to back-patch if we back-patch them all.
>
> Yeah, that makes fully sense. +1 to back-patch both then.
>
+1 for the back-patching.
For 0002, I think we could report the error a bit earlier — the better
place might be in the else part of the following IF-block, IMO:
/*
* If s->header_length == 0, then this is a full file; otherwise, it's
* an incremental file.
*/
if (s->header_length == 0)
Regards,
Amul
