Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amul Sul
Subject Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY
Date
Msg-id CAAJ_b94vzYp5u6yuTjYqhF1ZZfNNxdV_o-mEvSqQsdeEnY0RRw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY  (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY  (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Rotten again, attached the rebased version.

Regards,
Amul

On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 5:27 PM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 4:45 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> Thanks Bharath for your review.
>
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:02 AM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached is the rebase version for the latest master head(commit # 9f6f1f9b8e6).
> >
> > Some minor comments on 0001:
> > Isn't it "might not be running"?
> > +                 errdetail("Checkpointer might not running."),
> >
>
> Ok, fixed in the attached version.
>
> > Isn't it  "Try again after sometime"?
> > +                         errhint("Try after sometime again.")));
> >
>
> Ok, done.
>
> > Can we have ereport(DEBUG1 just to be consistent(although it doesn't
> > make any difference from elog(DEBUG1) with the new log messages
> > introduced in the patch?
> > +    elog(DEBUG1, "waiting for backends to adopt requested WAL
> > prohibit state change");
> >
>
> I think it's fine; many existing places have used elog(DEBUG1, ....) too.
>
> Regards,
> Amul

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: Truncate in synchronous logical replication failed
Next
From: Robins Tharakan
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm instance bichir stuck