Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amul Sul
Subject Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case
Date
Msg-id CAAJ_b94BpaGY_i15JCrx-dSc7CiR62Ub57ss-oxKr3n3JpEX2w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:07 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On 28/01/2022 12:10, Amul Sul wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:01 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >>
> >> After reading this patch and this thread, I have noticed that you are
> >> testing the same thing as Heikki here, patch 0001:
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52bc9ccd-8591-431b-0086-15d9acf25a3f@iki.fi
> >>
> >> The patch sent on the other thread has a better description and shape,
> >> so perhaps we'd better drop what is posted here in favor of the other
> >> version.  Thoughts?
> >
> > Yes, I do agree with you. Thanks for the comparison.
>
> Pushed the test from that other thread now. Thanks!
>

Thank you !

Regards,
Amul



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pgcrypto: Remove internal padding implementation