On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:13 PM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On a quick look at the latest 0001 patch, the following hunk to reset leftover
>> > flags seems to be unnecessary:
>> >
>> > + /*
>> > + * If some barrier types were not successfully absorbed, we will have
>> > + * to try again later.
>> > + */
>> > + if (!success)
>> > + {
>> > + ResetProcSignalBarrierBits(flags);
>> > + return;
>> > + }
>> >
>> > When the ProcessBarrierPlaceholder() function returns false without an error,
>> > that barrier flag gets reset within the while loop. The case when it has an
>> > error, the rest of the flags get reset in the catch block. Correct me if I am
>> > missing something here.
>>
>> Good catch. I think you're right. Do you want to update accordingly?
>
>
> Sure, Ill update that. Thanks for the confirmation.
>
Attached is the updated version where unnecessary ResetProcSignalBarrierBits()
call in 0001 patch is removed. The rest of the patches are unchanged, thanks.
>>
>> Andres, do you like the new loop better?
>>
Regards,
Amul
