Re: Support logical replication of global object commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zheng Li
Subject Re: Support logical replication of global object commands
Date
Msg-id CAAD30UKxL68cMVwwS86NvaJqtQsFgAg+2x8H=x8VjpESXCHZKw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support logical replication of global object commands  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support logical replication of global object commands
List pgsql-hackers
> Can we think of relying to send WAL of such DDLs just based on whether
> there is a corresponding publication (ex. publication of ALL OBJECTS)?
> I mean avoid database-specific filtering in decoding for such DDL
> commands but not sure how much better it is than the current proposal?

I think a publication of ALL OBJECTS sounds intuitive. Does it mean we'll
publish all DDL commands, all commit and abort operations in every
database if there is such publication of ALL OBJECTS?

Best,
Zheng



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical WAL sender unresponsive during decoding commit
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow file inclusion in pg_hba and pg_ident files