Yasir <yasir.hussain.shah@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I forgot to mention a third problem, which is that reassigning the >> alias during subquery pullup means it doesn't happen if subquery >> pullup doesn't happen.
> Yes, that is by design.
By design? How can you claim that's not a bug? The alias(es) associated with a VALUES clause surely should not vary depending on whether the clause includes a volatile function --- not to mention other unobvious reasons for flattening to happen or not.
By design of my solution, I was not taking it as a bug. But now, I agree with your opinion.
