Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date
Msg-id CAA8=A7-suZg90M7Fgyo1Rfymkrpdh_Z547RKXrbHirsAmojQSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> >>>> OK, this version contains pre-generated nss files, and passes a full
> >>>> buildfarm run including the ssl test module, with both openssl and NSS.
> >>>> That should keep the cfbot happy :-)
>
> Turns out the CFBot doesn't like the binary diffs.  They are included in this
> version too but we should probably drop them again it seems.
>

I did ask Thomas about this, he was going to try to fix it. In
principle we should want it to accept binary diffs exactly for this
sort of thing.


> The attached v9 contains mostly a first stab at getting some documentation
> going, it's far from completed but I'd rather share more frequently to not have
> local trees deviate too much in case you've had time to hack as well.  I had a
> few documentation tweaks in the code too, but no real functionality change for
> now.
>
> The 0001 patch isn't strictly necessary but it seems reasonable to address the
> various ways OpenSSL was spelled out in the docs while at updating the SSL
> portions.  It essentially ensures that markup around OpenSSL and SSL is used
> consistently.  I didn't address the linelengths being too long in this patch to
> make review easier instead.
>


I'll take a look.

cheers

andrew



-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: 回复:how to create index concurrently on partitioned table
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file