On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 3:18 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:10:31AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Well, that would be a bit sad. ISTM if we conclude that the current
> > behaviour is a bug we could commit the current patch and backpatch a
> > fix to honor a lower toast_tuple_threshold. But yes, time is tight.
>
> 48 hours remain, which is very tight. Let's see but the chances are
> small :(
>
> If we think that lowering toast_tuple_threshold should be supported
> then the patch on the other thread should be used first, perhaps
> back-patched (it lacks pieces with ALTER TABLE as pointed out as
> well). If we don't use the other patch, then what's proposed on this
> thread is actually wrong and should be reworked. In any case,
> something is wrong.
Yeah, I'd hoped for some more opinions. I agree we've run out of time :-(
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
