Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sami Imseih
Subject Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)
Date
Msg-id CAA5RZ0vs-zfYPc4aDmg8uTzbpgdh7vVdH8rf_KLrxX1CGP+_1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)  (Shayon Mukherjee <shayonj@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)
List pgsql-hackers
I went back to look at this patch and a few things. I noticed it did
not have correct
indentation, so I ran pgindent. I also removed some extra lines added and made
some slight adjustments to the docs. Attached my edited patch as a txt. If you
agree, please revise into a v14.

I also noticed that between v12 and v13, the GUC use_invisible_index
was removed,
but I don't see a discussion as to why. I feel it's a good GUC to have
[0], and we should
at least have it as a separate patch as part of this set.

I will continue reviewing the patch, but i feel this may be close to
be marked RFC, although
not sure if it will get a committer review before code freeze.

[0]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAA5RZ0udzydObMDi65C59-oq54B9ZmjSZ1wVH3h%2Bv4XiVm6QDA%40mail.gmail.com#cfea240ffd73e947f9edd1ef1c762dae


--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export