> I think this is a seriously bad idea. The first line is already
> overloaded; we don't need several different extensions adding more
> stuff to it.
Fair enough.
> Plus, this doesn't consider what to do in non-text
> output formats.
the hook will be a no-op for non-text formats, which is not
desirable behavior. I get that also.
I have no strong feelings for this, but wanted to see what
others think.
thanks!
--
Sami Imseih
