> Ideally we can also land the jumble funcs work in the other thread to allow extensions to re-use the
> in-core logic for jumbling expressions found in plan node trees.
IIUC, there should be a refactor I am working on at this moment to make that
possible [0]
>> > FWIW, Lukas did start a Wiki [0] to open the discussion for what parts
>> > of the plan should be used to compute a plan_id, and maybe we can
>> > in the future compite a plan_id in core by default.
>>
>> Let's see where this leads.. I suspect that this is going to take
>> some time, assuming that we're ever able to settle on a clear
>> definition. Perhaps we will, or perhaps we will not.
>
>
> I think there is a good chance we'll land on a reasonable planid calculation for core
I agree
> I'll be at PGConf.dev this year, would be great to do an unconference session to discuss this further.
That will be a good idea!
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z9khOo14yzZHCnmn%40paquier.xyz
