Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sami Imseih
Subject Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA5RZ0uLBzQs=feu=QzwthLg9wL_6hKJtr=7c0TuCegiVJT41g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
List pgsql-hackers
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 02:01, Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I created an entry for the July CF
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5691/
> >
> > ... and I realized I forgot to include David's code comment patch yesterday,
> > Reattaching both patches.
>
> I've pushed the code comment patch.
>
> For the docs patch, the fact you're having to name specific fields in
> the note at the bottom makes me think the details should be added to
> the row for the field in question instead.

Here is how per line will look like. Either way is fine with me.
with v2, I also did add the clarification in the pg_stat_database.tup_inserted|
updated|deleted fields as well.

-- 
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming relation data out of order